Baza de date „Diacronia” (BDD)

Agreeing possessors and the theory of case

Publicația: Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, XIII (2)
Editura:Universitatea din București
Rezumat:I argue that the so-called “possessive adjectives” are not really adjectives, but pronouns (D-projections). Agreement features on possessors do not compete with genitive-marking, as it seems at first sight: they never attach directly to DP, but rather to KP (i.e. to a projection of Case), as shown by the obligatory presence of a possessive suffix (which I analyze as K) separating the root from the agreement morpheme. I argue that this explains why the unvalued ϕ-features of the possessor do not agree with the inherent ϕ-features (I show that some agreeing possessors do have inherent ϕ-features): concord applies inside a DP-phase, and given that DP is a phase, the features attached to K above DP belong to the phase of the possessee rather than to the phase of the possessor. Further evidence for this proposal comes from agreeing genitive markers attached at the phrasal level and from agreeing markers attached to a genitive morpheme. I then discuss the implications of this analysis for the theory of structural case: given that agreeing possessors can represent structural case, but their K must be specified as possessive from the beginning of the derivation, structural case cannot be considered to be unvalued case. Moreover, the fact that case concord is often found among agreeing possessors also shows that one and the same K head can have structural case in need of licensing and an unvalued Case feature valued by concord. Finally, I propose an account for agreeing possessors which seem to be doubly marked, both by a case ending or possessive suffix + agreement (at the word level) and by a preposed agreement marker attached at the phrasal level.
Cuvinte-cheie:agreeing possessors, case theory, structural case, concord, genitive case

Citări la această publicație: 8

Referințe în această publicație: 5

396Valeria Guțu Romalo (coord.)GALR
Gramatica limbii române. I. Cuvântul; II. Enunțul
Editura Academiei2005; 2008
14A. AlexiadouFunctional Structure in NominalsJohn Benjamins2001
3Yves D’Hulst, Martine Coene, Liliane TasmowskiOn the Syntax of Romanian Possessor PhrasesRRL, XLII (3-4), 1491997
6Alexandra CornilescuRemarks on the Romanian Ordinal Numeral. Towards a Unitary Description of Phrases Headed by ALRRL, XXXIX (3-4), 3031994
214Hariton TiktinRumänisch-deutsches WörterbuchImprimeria Statului; Otto Harrassowitz1903-1925; 1985-1988, 2001-2005

Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].

Prima pagină: