Baza de date „Diacronia” (BDD)

Towards an account of differential object marking in romanian

Publicația: Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, XII (1)
Editura:Universitatea din București
Rezumat:This paper proposes an analysis of Differential Object Marking in present-day Romanian along the lines of the DRT framework put forth by Kamp and Reyle (1993) and developed by Farkas and de Swart (2001), Farkas (2002), and Farkas and Heusinger (2003). We provide an answer to the question as to what exactly (i.e. what semantic parameter) is responsible for Differential Object Marking in Romanian. A relevant answer seems to be the notion of “determined reference” which points to the stability of value given to a variable across verifying assignment functions – the narrower the allowed variation, the more stable the expression is. It seems, however, that other factors such as “animacy” or “the intention of the speaker” also need to be taken into account.
Cuvinte-cheie:differential object marking, determined reference, stability of reference, animacy

Citări la această publicație: 3

7Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)Sintaxa limbii române vechiUnivers Enciclopedic Gold2019
85Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)The Syntax of Old RomanianOxford University Press2016
1Mihaela Adriana Marchis“Move vs. Agree”: the case of Clitic DoublingBWPL, XIV (1)2012pdf

Referințe în această publicație: 1

12Martine Coene, Larisa AvramNull objects and accusative clitics in RomanianBWPL, XI (1)2009pdf

Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].

Prima pagină: