Titlu: | Autour du concept de symbole |
Autor: | Daniela Mirea |
Publicația: | Journal of Romanian Literary Studies, 11, p. 228-236 |
e-ISSN: | 2248-3004 |
Editura: | Arhipelag XXI Press |
Locul: | Tîrgu-Mureş |
Anul: | 2017 |
Rezumat: | Our article aims to make an analysis of the symbolic sign concept as it was understood and defined by different paradigms of thinking: religious, philosophical, psychoanalytic, linguistic. The representatives of tradition and modernity do not have in mind the same referent when talking about the symbol. The structuralist theories of the symbol are the reflex of a scientist society, they reduce the symbol either to a dyadic structure or to a triadic structure according to different schools of semiotics, knowingly denying the metaphysical referent. In the conception of tradition, the existence of the metaphysical referent is a sine qua non condition. We are dealing with two different paradigms of thinking; the working tools of structuralist semiologists are not functional in the logic of analogy. Our article insists on the dynamics and specificity of the religious sign. |
Cuvinte-cheie: | symbolic sign, linguistics, psychoanalysis, symbolic religious sign, Mircea Eliade |
Limba: | franceză |
Linkuri: | ![]() ![]() |
Citări la această publicație: 0
Referințe în această publicație: 0
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
Prima pagină:
