[Strong and less than strong points in G. Ivănescu’s attempt to relate linguistics to logic and stylistics] In his reform of linguistic syntax, G. Ivănescu’s works with determineds (names, respectively predicative verbs) and determinants (namely nouns, pronouns, and numerals as attributes, respectively complements and predicative names). The idea that the secondary sentence is a compound name to complement the predicate in the main sentence is highly adequate, but, if he really meant to go all the way, the author should have considered in detail the mechanisms of determination. Noam Chomsky was to do it ten years later in his celebrated Syntactic Structures, that inaugurates the synthetic structuralism (as generativism) in category-type grammar.
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă. Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
pdf 
html 
