Baza de date „Diacronia” (BDD)
Titlu:

Relaţia dintre discursul repetat şi intertext în literatura postmodernistă

Autor:
Publicația: Limba română: controverse, delimitări, noi ipoteze. Actele celui de-al 9-lea Colocviu al Catedrei de Limba Română, II, Secțiunea Pragmatică și stilistică, p. 15
Editori:Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae
Editura:Editura Universității din București
Locul:București
Anul:
Rezumat:[The Relation between Repeated Speech and Intertext in Postmodernist Literature] The present work discusses and analyses the ways in which repeated speech (a „coserian” concept) becomes an intertextual code in postmodernist literature.
After a classification of the types of repeated speech, we noticed both common and different elements of the two phenomena, but also the that these elements interfere at the level of poetic and literary convention in the postmodernist type.
The first distinction, between repeated speech and intertext, entailed that repeated speech (as Coseriu names it) is in fact a reality of spontaneous language, connected with a certain tradition of synchronic language which can appear in the literary text as well (although, as a phenomenon, it appeared and developed in speech firstly). First of all, we have used paremic expressions excerpted from literary texts. The intertext appeared especially in the written language, in literature, and it also extended in media: written and audiovisual press, cinema, etc..
Secondly, repeated speech is distinguished by the intertext through the fact that the former is a basic element, a code through which the intertext decrypts itself, a micro-language factor which appears as intertext at macro-level.
The common element of repeated speech and intertext is that they define themselves as a ready made speech, presented in the reader or speaker’s consciousness. The same linguistic fact can be found at the changed intertextual level in different variants.
The interference of these two phenomena in the postmodernist literature is justified through the conventions of this type of literature (orality reek), and this is done through a certain type of dialogue (intertextual) with the characters and with the reader. The poetics of the postmodernism, which promotes “the esthetic decanonization”, gathers all that is not aesthetic and suggests a new type of literalness through “recycling”. This way, by elimining textual coherence and narrative focus, it was possible for already-conventionalized facts of language (repeated speech, linguistic isolations) to become ways of expression of postmodernist literary conventions.
Limba: română
Linkuri:  

Citări la această publicație: 1

Referințe în această publicație: 4

44Stelian DumistrăcelDiscursul repetat în textul jurnalistic
Tentația instituirii comuniunii fatice prin mass-media
Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”2006html
184Rodica ZafiuDiversitate stilistică în româna actualăEditura Universităţii2001html
28Rodica ZafiuNarațiune și poezieAll2000
42Florica DimitrescuLocuțiunile verbale în limba românăEditura Academiei1958

Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].

Prima pagină: