| Titlu: | Considerations on neonimy and the neonims |
| Autor: | Inga Druță |
| Publicația: | The Proceedings of the International Conference Globalization, Intercultural Dialogue and National Identity. Section: Language and Discourse, 4, p. 211-215 |
| ISBN: | 978-606-8624-01-3 |
| Editori: | Iulian Boldea, Cornel Sigmirean |
| Editura: | Arhipelag XXI Press |
| Locul: | Tîrgu-Mureș |
| Anul: | 2017 |
| Rezumat: | In the specialty literature, there is a distinction between general neology, terminological neology or neonymy and neologisms of common use, as well as specialized and terminological ones, also called neonyms (new denominations) and neosemes (new meanings). Neonyms establish themselves as a denominative necessity and prove to be more stable over time in comparison to the neologisms of common use, presenting the net characteristics of an intentional manifestation. Therefore, neonymy works in the case of terminology vacuum. Several papers show that strictly from the formal point of view, neologisms and neonyms share the same methods of formation, available in any language. Even though there are some differences between general and specialized neology (neonymy), there are also some opinions that nowadays in the „terminological information era” (Depecker), the theory and the metodology of research in the specialty neology has to be reconsidered. |
| Cuvinte-cheie: | neonymy, neonym, neology, neologism, denomination |
| Limba: | română |
| Linkuri: |  pdf  html |
Citări la această publicație: 0
Referințe în această publicație: 0
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
Prima pagină:
