| Titlu: | Discurs, reprezentare şi identitate. Asupra funcţiei conceptuale a tautologiei |
| Autor: | Mircea-Constantin Breaz |
| Publicația: | Limbă, identitate, multilingvism şi politici educaţionale, p. 183 |
| ISBN: | 978-606-92223-7-9 |
| Editori: | Horváth István, Tódor Erika Mária |
| Editura: | Editura Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităţilor Naţionale |
| Locul: | Cluj-Napoca |
| Anul: | 2010 |
| Rezumat: | [Discourse, Representation and Identity. On the Conceptual Function of Tautology] Tautologies formalize operatory structures whose circularity expresses, in its most general form, the dialectic of individual subject and epistemological subject, according to the conceptual relation established between the singularity of the actualisation and the plurality of the actualisable. For this reason, tautological repetitions in identity represent complex dialectical analogies that equate essence and phenomenon, essence and gnoseological model respectively. When the relative circularity of tautological structures does not challenge the limits of common discursive conscience in the representation of reality, these structures of representation via mediated reference highlight the normative discourse of the age, its mentalities, discursive behaviours, and the dominants of its linguistic conscience, transposed, in their turn, into rhetorico-discursive behaviours codified by an immanent axiological determinism. From the point of view of the relation between representation and identity, tautologies are assertions of existence in which not only boundaries for the realities of representation are discursively set, the reality of enunciation comprised, but also boundaries of the possibilities for rhetorico-discursive knowledge, in order to establish a discursive order from whose conceptual perspective desirable realities are expressed, rather than facts. This sort of assertions of existence usually take the form of persuasive definitions regarding, therefore, not what the content of the various rhetorico-discursive objects concerning existence, knowledge, thought and language is, in the discursive conscience of the receiver, but rather what it should be. This is the essence of the conceptual function (intellective or eidetic) of tautological identities, a general rhetorico-discursive function, (self)ordering, systematically enacting the pretence of the generally valid reason, permanent and effective. Subsequently, the legitimisation, in the Aristotelian sense, of the conceptual function of tautological definitions, a general function from the persuasive signification spectrum, has, in the end, the authority to authenticate tautological discursivity itself, at both the attentional and intentional levels, in the course of the always-implying-resemantisation discursive practices characterising the various attempts of returning understanding through explicitation. |
| Limba: | română |
| Linkuri: |  html |
Citări la această publicație: 0
Referințe în această publicație: 0
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
