| Titlu: | Strategic use of dissociation in ethical argumentation on abortion |
| Autor: | Simona Mazilu |
| Publicația: | Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, X (2) |
| p-ISSN: | 2069-9239 |
| Editura: | Universitatea din București |
| Locul: | București |
| Anul: | 2008 |
| Rezumat: | This paper is concerned with the dialectical and rhetorical consequences of the use of dissociation in ethical argumentation on abortion. Disputants make strategic use of dissociation to advance their standpoints, to establish the starting points of the discussion and to argue in favor or against abortion as well. From the pragma-dialectical perspective (van Rees 2002, 2003, 2005a, 2005b, 2006), dissociation is defined as an argumentative technique by which a unitary concept is divided into two different concepts of which one is intended as positive while the other one as negative. The analysis of a religious text on abortion shows that by means of dissociation abortion can be conceived of as “an unspeakable crime” or “the deliberate killing of an innocent human being” as opposed to “interruption of pregnancy”, the term preferred by pro-choice supporters. I claim that the protagonist uses dissociation as a rhetorical strategy aimed at persuading both the interlocutor and the audience. |
| Cuvinte-cheie: | dissociation, strategic maneuvering, dialectical (un)soundness, fallacies |
| Linkuri: |  pdf  html |
Citări la această publicație: 0
Referințe în această publicație: 0
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
Prima pagină:
