Baza de date „Diacronia” (BDD)

Strong Indefinites are not Quantificational: Proportional many vs most

Publicația: Revue roumaine de linguistique, LVIII (4), p. 401-417
Editura:Editura Academiei
Rezumat:This paper is concerned with the analysis of strong indefinites and in particular of the proportional readings of many. Can we account for the proportional readings of many by assuming a uniform analysis, according to which many is a cardinality predicate, or do we need to postulate an ambiguity between a cardinality predicate and a quantificational determiner (Partee 1989)? I will argue in favour of the uniform analysis by comparing proportional most with proportional many: it will be shown that the former is necessarily a quantificational determiner (as in Generalized Quantifier theory, contra Hackl 2009), whereas the latter is a cardinality predicate inside a strong indefinite DP. This somewhat paradoxical result (a strong DP built with weak many) will be given a compositional semantics by assuming that constituents of the form many NP are headed by a null Determiner that has the semantics of plural some.
Limba: engleză

Citări la această publicație: 0

Referințe în această publicație: 1

15Carmen Dobrovie-Sorin, Ion GiurgeaThe Suffixation of Definite Articles in Balkan LanguagesRRL, LI (1), 73-1032006pdf

Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă.
Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].

Prima pagină: