“Diacronia” bibliometric database (BDD)
Title:

Este dublarea complementului direct un fenomen de acord?

Author:
Publication: Limba română: controverse, delimitări, noi ipoteze. Actele celui de-al 9-lea Colocviu al Catedrei de Limba Română, I, Section Gramatică, p. 27
Editors:Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae
Publisher:Editura Universității din București
Place:București
Year:
Abstract:[Clitic Doubling and Agreement in Romanian] In this article, I present some arguments against the hypothesis that clitic doubling (CD) in Romanian is an agreement phenomenon: (i) CD is optional, depending on the semantic type of the direct object, whilst agreement phenomena are obligatory; (ii) the direct object marked by CD is +specific. Specificity is not one of the features implied in agreement phenomena in Romanian (these features are gender, number, person and case); (iii) in general, agreement is redundant, it doesn't contribute new information; (iv) all the other agreement phenomena in Romanian are marked by inflectional affixes; the elements involved in CD are pronominal clitics, not affixes (according to several morphological tests).
Language: Romanian
Links:  

Citations to this publication: 1

References in this publication: 3

2Marleen van PeteghemLe redoublement clitique en roumain et en espagnol et l’opposition accusatif vs. datifAUI, XLIX-L, 4232003-2004
265Angela Bidu-Vrănceanu, Cristina Călărașu, Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Mihaela Mancaș, Gabriela Pană DindeleganDicționar de științe ale limbiiEditura Nemira2001; 2005
13Carmen Dobrovie-SorinSintaxa limbii române
Studii de sintaxă comparată a limbilor romanice
Editura Univers2000

The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].

Preview: