Title: | Metastance in the Romanian Parliamentary Discourse: Case Studies |
Author: | Andra Vasilescu |
Publication: | Revue roumaine de linguistique, LV (4), p. 365-380 |
p-ISSN: | 0035-3957 |
Publisher: | Editura Academiei |
Place: | București |
Year: | 2010 |
Abstract: | The article presents three case studies on the Romanian traditional Parliamentary Discourse (one discourse given by Titu Maiorescu, 1877 and two discourses given by Nicolae Iorga, 1908, 1919, respectively) and aims at identifying correlations between stance-taking, metastance and persuasion. The analysis revealed objective metastance based on logic in Maiorescu’s discourse vs. subjective metastance based on ethos and pathos in Iorga’s discourses. Beyond differences in metastance and persuasion, some culturally shared values were traced in the three samples. Metastance activities in Parliament are consistent with the intense face work activities in Romanian every day conversations. |
Language: | English |
Links: | ![]() ![]() |
Citations to this publication: 3
0 | Oana Chelaru-Murăruș | Rhetorical Strategies of Self-Defence in Varujan Vosganian’s Parliamentary Speech | AUB, LXVII, 3-18 | 2018 | |
1 | Răzvan Săftoiu | Split voices in political discourse | LD, 5 (3), 430-448 | 2015 | |
1 | Florin Sterian | Bibliografia românească de lingvistică (BRL, 54, 2011). Lucrări de lingvistică apărute în țara noastră în cursul anului 2011 | LR, LXI (4), 437-576 | 2012 | pdf html |
References in this publication: 0
The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].
Preview:
