“Diacronia” bibliometric database (BDD)

The posterity of Émile Benveniste’s ideas

Publication: The Proceedings of the International Conference Globalization, Intercultural Dialogue and National Identity. Section: Language and Discourse, 4, p. 368-377
Editors:Iulian Boldea, Cornel Sigmirean
Publisher:Arhipelag XXI Press
Abstract:Pragmatics was initially considered as a component of semiotics, later acquiring an autonomous status. Émile Benveniste opened the perspective of pragmatic approach by consideration of some concepts: „enunciation”, „subjectivity”, „discourse”, „deictic” etc. The attention given to the formal apparatus of enunciation contributed to the imposition of consistency in subsequent pragmatic research. At the end of the last century, several research modalities arouse: orientation towards the conventionality of enunciation and towards the relation between enunciation-meaning (H. Parret), approaching enunciation from a semiotic perspective (M. Hammad), openness towards the interlocution theory (Fr. Jacques). Reconsidering the “subjectivity” concept from Benveniste’s theory, some researchers – G. Paugam and V. Alexandrescu – emphasized the contrastive patters given by Kant, respectively by Descartes. The openness perspectives of Émile Benveniste’s theories reflected on pragmatic, semiotic, research, echoing in text linguistics as well.
Key words:discourse,enunciation, inter-subjectivity, pragmatics, subjectivity
Language: Romanian

Citations to this publication: 0

References in this publication: 2

261Angela Bidu-Vrănceanu, Cristina Călărașu, Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Mihaela Mancaș, Gabriela Pană DindeleganDicționar de științe ale limbiiEditura Nemira2001; 2005
2Anca CosăceanuEnunțarea – repere semioticeSCL, XXXVIII (1), 741987

The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].