Title: | Discoursive markers and the argumentative discourse |
Author: | Aurelia Nicoleta Pavel (Dicu) |
Publication: | The Proceedings of the International Conference Globalization, Intercultural Dialogue and National Identity. Section: Language and Discourse, 1, p. 580-588 |
ISBN: | 978-606-93691-3-5 |
Editors: | Iulian Boldea |
Publisher: | Arhipelag XXI Press |
Place: | Tîrgu-Mureş |
Year: | 2014 |
Abstract: | Argumentation has been a constant preoccupation of philosophers along the centuries since Aristotle. The emergence of discourse analysis as a new discipline turned the perspective on human communication parsing from a philosophico-rhetorical basis to a linguistic one. As Anscombre and Ducrot stated, even if in a somehow extreme manner, arguing is a central element within the information exchange mechanism and, implicitly, the social interaction. Therefore, in the attempt of giving an account of how the discourse organizes on argumentative ground, the analysis of the discourse markers, the role of which is mainly (but not the only one) of assuring its cohesion and coherence, disclosed a tight relation between these lexical expressions, discourse concatenation and the intentions behind speaker’s utterances. After necessary review of the main theoretical models about the matter, we have selected from Romanian journals some representative examples from our point of view for further analysis with the purpose of pointing up these relations and their importance in assembling the argumentative discourse. |
Key words: | argumentation, relevance, discourse analysis, discourse markers, argumentative structure, argumentative scales, procedural encoding |
Language: | Romanian |
Links: | ![]() ![]() |
Citations to this publication: 0
References in this publication: 0
The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].
Preview:
