| Title: | Prenominal and postnominal reduced relative clauses: arguments against unitary analyses |
| Author: | Petra Sleeman |
| Publication: | Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, IX (1) |
| p-ISSN: | 2069-9239 |
| Publisher: | Universitatea din București |
| Place: | București |
| Year: | 2007 |
| Abstract: | These last years, several analyses have been proposed in which prenominal and postnominal reduced relatives are merged in the same position. Kayne (1994) claims that both types of reduced relative clauses are the complement of the determiner. More recently, Cinque (2005) has proposed that both types are merged in the functional projections of the noun, at the left edge of the modifier system. In this paper, I argue against a unitary analysis of prenominal and postnominal participial reduced relatives. |
| Key words: | reduced relatives, participle, postnominal eventives, prenominal eventives, prenominal statives, pronominal resultatives |
| Links: |  pdf  html |
Citations to this publication: 4
| 1 | Petra Sleeman | Deverbal modifiers of the noun in Germanic and Romance: interpretation and position | BWPL, XIII (1) | 2011 | pdf html |
| 0 | Viorela-Valentina Dima | A few remarks on Romanian supine relatives | BWPL, XII (1) | 2010 | pdf html |
| 2 | Viorela-Valentina Dima | Interpretarea temporală a participiului adnominal | Controverse, I, 61 | 2010 | |
| 0 | Petra Sleeman | Deverbal categories and the split vP hypothesis | BWPL, XI (1) | 2009 | pdf html |
References in this publication: 1
| 14 | A. Alexiadou | Functional Structure in Nominals | John Benjamins | 2001 |
The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].
Preview:
