Cette étude examine l’impact des renouvellements occidentaux sur la critique roumaine des années 1960s. On y propose un aperçu, en considérant les circonstances idéologiques de l’époque, des progrès aussi bien que des inerties ou des décalages du discours critique roumain. Tandis que le marxisme et le structuralisme n’ont qu’un petit nombre d’adeptes, les critiques de l’École de Genève réjouissent d’un accueil favorable aux années 1960s grâce à leur rapprochement d’un paradigme de Călinescu.
The study assesses the influence of the Occidental improvements on the Romanian criticism of the ’60s. It emphasizes, considering the ideological circumstances of the epoch, both the developments and the stagnations or phase shifts of the Romanian critical discourse. Whereas Marxism and Structuralism have few followers, the critics of the Geneva School benefitted from favourable reception during the ’60, since they came closer to a Călinescu paradigm.
Lista citărilor/referințelor nu cuprinde decît texte prezente în baza de date, nefiind deci exhaustivă. Pentru trimiterea de texte, semnalarea oricăror greșeli, și eventualul refuz ca „Diacronia” să facă publice textele, vă rugăm să folosiți adresa de email [Please enable javascript to view.].
pdf 
html 
