Article
Diacronia 4, August 1, 2016, A53 (1–16)doi:10.17684/i4A53en

Prospects and problems of prototype theory

Dirk Geeraerts

Affiliations

Department of Linguistics, Catholic University of Leuven, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, PO Box 03308, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

History

Received June 5, 2016
Accepted June 13, 2016
Published August 1, 2016

Key words

cognitive linguistics

Abstract

Parallel to the research that I did on the application of prototype theory to questions of semantic change (which eventually resulted in my Diachronic Prototype Semantics monograph of 1997), I paid attention on a number of occasions to the theoretical clarification of the notion of prototypicality as such (and of the related notion of polysemy: see the second section of this collection). In the paper reprinted here, I try to bring some systematicity into the many uses of the concept ‘prototypicality’ by distinguishing between two cross-classifying dimensions. First, I make a distinction between two crucial structural phenomena underlying prototypicality effects: flexibility (i.e. the absence of clear boundaries and demarcations) and salience (i.e. differences of structural weight). Second, I suggest that both prototypicality phenomena may be found on an intensional level (the level of definitions) and on an extensional level (the level of referents). The cross-classification of the two dimensions defines four basic types of prototypicality effects.

Links

  • Full text (in English; 16 p., 210 KB)
  • References and citations in BDD
  • Export citation
    Text:Geeraerts, D. (2016). Prospects and problems of prototype theory, Diacronia 4 (August 1), A53 (1–16), http://dx.doi.org/10.17684/i4A53en
    BibTeX:@ARTICLE{geeraerts2016,
     author = {Dirk Geeraerts},
     title = {Prospects and problems of prototype theory},
     journal = {Diacronia},
     ISSN = {2393-1140},
     year = {2016},
     month = {August},
     number = {4},
     eid = {A53},
     doi = {10.17684/i4A53en},
     pages = "(1–16)",
     url = {http://www.diacronia.ro/journal/issue/4/A53/en}
    }

Copyright

© 2016 The Authors. Publishing rights belong to the Journal. The article is freely-accessible under the terms and conditions of the CC-BY Open Access licence.

Statistics (RO/EN/Total)

  • Views (this page): 395 / 487 / 882

  • Downloads (full text): 526 / 951 / 1477