“Diacronia” bibliometric database (BDD)
Title:

Din nou despre dativul posesiv din grupul verbal. Observaţii asupra limbii române vechi

Author:
Publication: Limba română, LVIII (2), Section Gramatică, p. 173-182
p-ISSN:0024-3523
Publisher:Editura Academiei
Place:București
Year:
Abstract:The author’s objective was to compare possessive structures with a dative clitic attached to the verb in the present-day language with the data offered by the original texts in the old language (16th – 18th centuries). The comparison revealed the fact that the Romanian language, in its historical evolution, does not show significant structural modifications in what concerns the structures mentioned above: we deal with the same syntactic and semantic typology of the external possessor structures, whereas the freedoms and the constraints of combination are the same for both phases of evolution. The very few differences between the two stages in the evolution of the Romanian language refer to the difference frequency between internal possessor structures and external possessor ones, which, in the old language, proves to be in favor of the former ones. In the old language, the structures with double possessor (internal and external, at the same time) are more numerous, and their occurrence is less constrained than in the current language.
Key words:
  • dativ posesiv adverbal, comparaţie limba veche – limba actuală, tipologia construcţiilor posesive, exprimarea dublă (adverbală şi adnominală) a posesorului, libertăţi şi constrângeri ale construcţiei
  • adverbal possessive dative, comparison old language – contemporary language, the typology of possessive constructions, double actualization (adverbal and adnominal) of the possessor, constraints on the construction
Language: Romanian
Links:  

Citations to this publication: 10

1Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)Sintaxa limbii române vechiUnivers Enciclopedic Gold2019
0Monica Huțanu, Mirjana ĆorkovićDativul posesiv românesc și problemele achiziției sale la studenții din SerbiaRST, I, 107-1242017pdf
html
70Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)The Syntax of Old RomanianOxford University Press2016
2Dana-Luminița TeleoacăConservatorism şi expresivitate în literatura religioasă. Posibile repere de definire a unui stil ştiinţific (didactic) în context religiosLR, LXII (1), 462013pdf
html
52Gheorghe Chivu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu, Irina Nicula Paraschiv (ed.)Studii de istorie a limbii române
Morfosintaxa limbii literare în secolele al XIX-lea și al XX-lea
Editura Academiei2012, 2015
6Dana-Luminița TeleoacăMorfosintaxa textului biblic actual: Evanghelia după MateiLR, LXI (1), 912012pdf
html
5Dana-Luminița TeleoacăConservatisme et expressivité dans la littérature religieuse. Quelques repères dans la définition d’un style scientifique (didactique) au niveau religieuxBibl. Jass., 3, 552012pdf
html
4Dana-Luminița TeleoacăParticularităţi morfosintactice ale textului contemporan de rugăciune (I)LRM, XXI (11-12), 512011pdf
3Valentin RomanComplement indirect datival, atribut pronominal datival sau… complement posesiv?AUT, XLIX, 832011pdf
html
1Florin SterianBibliografia românească de lingvistică (BRL, 52, 2009). Lucrări de lingvistică apărute în țara noastră în cursul anului 2009LR, LIX (3), 307-4432010pdf

References in this publication: 3

4Marina Rădulescu SalaDespre complementul posesiv – note şi completăriDindelegan2007
191Gheorghe Chivu, Magdalena Georgescu, Magdalena Ioniță, Alexandru Mareș, Alexandra Roman Moraru (ed.)Documente și însemnări românești din secolul al XVI-leaEditura Academiei1979
59Mirela Teodorescu, Ion Gheție (ed.)Manuscrisul de la IeudEditura Academiei1977

The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].

Preview: