“Diacronia” bibliometric database (BDD)
Title:

L’accord du participe passé en ancien roumain

Author:
Publication: Linguistica Atlantica, 33 (2), p. 38-51
Thematic volume: Old Romanian: Diachronic syntax and semantics
p-ISSN:1188-9932
Publisher:Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association
Place:Newfoundland
Year:
Abstract:This paper is a descriptive investigation of past participle agreement in Old Romanian. It is shown that the passive past participle constantly agreed with the subject; in contrast, the past participle serving as a tense/mood formative showed agreement variations, unlike in Modern Romanian, where it is invariable. Variation occurs when the auxiliary is ‘be’, with transitive verbs (when there is no possible confusion with the passive construction), and with unaccusative verbs (which do not allow passivization and consequently agreement cannot led to confusions). The agreement of the formative past participle has been lost in standard Modern Romanian but it is still attested in certain regional varieties, either with the auxiliary ‘be’ or with the auxiliary ‘have’. Special constructions (i.e. past participle agreement with the direct object, the past participle with the ending , the ‘fake’ agreement of the past participle) are also taken into consideration. The paper underlines, on the one hand, the differences between Old Romanian and Modern Romanian and, on the other hand, the differences and similarities between (Old and Modern) Romanian and other Romance languages.
Key words:Old Romanian, past participle, agreement, auxiliary ‘be’
Language: English
Links:  

Citations to this publication: 1

57Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.)The Syntax of Old RomanianOxford University Press2016

References in this publication: 17

8Adam LedgewayRomance Auxiliary Selection in Light of Romanian EvidenceDVR, 3-342015
16Adina DragomirescuO schimbare parametrică de la româna veche la româna modernă în sintaxa formelor verbale compuse cu auxiliar LR, LXII (2), 2252013pdf
html
6Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru NicolaeUrme ale selecţiei auxiliarului de perfect compus în românăDimitrescu – Niculescu, I, 3382013
4Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Carmen Mîrzea VasilePe marginea unei construcții vechi și populare: «(mi-)a fost dat (să ...)». Cu referire la limba vecheMarin, 377-3832013
4Natalya I. StolovaSplit Intransitivity in Old Spanish: Irrealis and Negation FactorsRRL, LI (2), 301-3202006pdf
html
168Ion Gheție, Mirela Teodorescu (ed.)Psaltirea HurmuzakiEditura Academiei2005
14A. AlexiadouFunctional Structure in NominalsJohn Benjamins2001
4Larisa AvramAuxiliary Configurations in English and RomanianRRL, XXXIX (5-6), 4931994
124Gheorghe Chivu (ed.)Codex Sturdzanus
Studiu filologic, studiu lingvistic, ediţie de text şi indice de cuvinte
Editura Academiei1993
9Maria MarinMorfologia verbului în graiurile munteneștiFD, X, 451991
64Mihail Moxa; G. Mihăilă (ed.)Cronica universalăEditura Minerva1989
56Ion CoteanuGramatica de bază a limbii româneAlbatros; Garamond1982; 1993, 1995
173Mariana Costinescu (ed.)Codicele VoronețeanEditura Minerva1981
179Gheorghe Chivu, Magdalena Georgescu, Magdalena Ioniță, Alexandru Mareș, Alexandra Roman Moraru (ed.)Documente și însemnări românești din secolul al XVI-leaEditura Academiei1979
79I. Rizescu (ed.)Pravila ritorului LucaciEditura Academiei1971
180Viorica Pamfil (ed.)Palia de la Orăştie (1581-1582)
Text, facsimile, indice
Editura Academiei1968
187Ovid DensusianuIstoria limbii române
II. Secolul al XVI-lea
Ernest Leroux; J. Byck1938; 1961

The citations/references list is based on indexed publications only, and may therefore be incomplete.
For any and all inquiries related to the database, please contact us at [Please enable javascript to view.].

Preview: